#PEPTLiveUpdates : Final Update on Today’s Tribunal hearing

Wahala in the courtroom APC: My learned colleague has cited a wrong thing and should be held in professional misconduct The whole court shouted ahhhhhh Justice Tsammani: Please don’t say such. Stop it. That’s why I said we should move on. SAN Okutepa is now on his feet SAN Okutepa: My lord permit me to state my objection APC: I am still standing sit down. SAN Okutepa: But I am standing to State my objection APC: You should know your senior and sit down when your senior is up Everyone in the court: AAARRRHHHHHH

Justice Tsammani: What is that. How would you say such Don’t say such

Justice Ugo: You’re his senior then you should know you’re supposed to sit when an objection is being raised Everyone in the court: Oh ohhhh

Justice Adah: You should know you will sit during an objection.

Justice Ugo: Please let’s maintain peace. This court case would finish and go but the both of you would still remain here as learned counsels. Don’t disrespect yourselves because of a case. Oh ohhhh thank you APC elder lawyer, you’re everyone’s senior well done oh, SAN Ancestor .

The judges have now stated they would give their judgement on this case at final hearing. And asked that the witness goes ahead.

SAN Okutepa has asked the witness to present his evidence. The witness brings out 2 red flash drives.

INEC: My learned colleague is giving me red flash drive instead of blue like my Chelsea.

SAN Okutepa: I know Pinhero is a Chelsea fan so he can have a red one like my Arsenal.

Justice Tsammani: You should have given him blue for Chelsea

SAN Okutepa: That’s why I gave him red card.

Justice Tsammani: But both of you are still losers, both Chelsea and Arsenal didn’t even win anything Stray bullet have hit Chelsea and Arsenal fans today, losers association Justice Tsammani: Number 2 and number 18 Losers association.

The flash drive’s temdered by the Channels TV witness was not objected to by INEC, Tinubu, Shettima and APC

That’s a surprise. They did not object to the admissibility of this evidence.

SAN Okutepa has now applied to play the flash drives. Time for movie Somebody should tag INEC and tag Festus Okoye to say cheeeeeese Hold on, Tinubu’s lawyers are up

SAN Olujimi: My lord objection I object to this flash drive being played Wahala What’s all this na Objection Objection Objection all the time

INEC lawyer is up SAN Pinhero; My lord, we are indifferent about playing this flash drive It’s already admitted into evidence.

Ahn Ahn INEC don give up Everyone is laughing

APC Lawyers: We stand with our colleagues to object to this flash drive being played so that we can go back to watch it. We have not played it yet to know the content and we would need to prepare for cross examination. This evidence should not be played APC Objection objection all the time. They even objected to the form that announced their candidate yesterday.

APC, Tinubu and Shettima lawyers are currently objecting to the video presented by Channels TV to be played.

APC: We need to be served first before you play the video. This is an ambush SAN Okutepa: There’s no law that states such. My lord, we can move on and see what the witness wants us to see.

SAN Okutepa has cited the court to Geo Memorial Medical Center Vs National Directorate of Employment 2013 Justice Tsammani: That case does not apply. SAN Okutepa: My lord it does.

 

Justice Adah: It doesn’t apply to this situation

SAN Okutepa: My lord, it applies because the respondent is saying we can’t play

Justice Bolaji: Learned silk, you’re not listening. We have said it doesn’t apply but you’re still insisting Okay

Justice Tsamamni: Evwn if, the time is far spent. We can’t do anything anymore today.

SAN Okutepa: As the court pleases my lord Justice Tsammani has just ruled that if not for time today, the video would have been played. So the video from Channels TV witness was not played and the witness was stepped down.

Justice Tsammani: We would need to leave because the time is gone and if not for time we would have played this video because if it was a document we would have moved on to listen, what’s the difference with a video as long as it’s from the witness. There’s no difference.

Justice Ugo: Exactly, none, we just wasted time arguing. The video would have been played today.

Justice Tsammani: The court would be adjourned to tomorrow 10th June 2023 2pm

SAN Olujimi: Some of us are going to watch movies on Saturday Justice Ugo: You can watch from Your house.

Justice Tsammani: Okutepa bring blue flash drives tomorrow

SAN Okutepa: No it would be red card for Arsenal

Justice Tsammani: I’m blues oh You better look around your surroundings before you talk bad about Chelsea

Justice Tsammani is a Chelsea fan, Such a sad moment I wonder how he was breathing all through this EPL season, he’s such a strong man Up Chelsea the strongest team in the EPL

The 2nd and 3rd respondents (BAT/SHETT) are OBJECTING to the video being played That They they should have been served the video first and that the Law frowns against springing up of surprises! 4th respondent (APC) said NO OBJECTION! Court has ADMITTED it and tagged as Exh PBH 3

Court admitted the videos but objects to the 1st one (as applied), being played saying it should actually have been served the other parties

Court is Hereby ADJOURNED Till Tomorrow, Saturday June 10th, 2023 by 2pm!

 

– serah Ibrahim, Miss pearls

About Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *