Why am i taking my time to reel out all these facts?
I want to make sure the “compromised Mainstream media” don’t feed you with FAKE NEWS which most of them have been paid to do collectively.
They have a common WhatsApp group….. But no wahala….
Below are the Forensic analysis of the 32 documents of Bola A Tinubu as released by CSU by @MissPearls.
A FORENSIC TAKE ON THE CSU DOCUMENTS BY MissPearls
I took time to go through the documents over and over again and I found these discrepancies which have hitherto gone unnoticed:
—CSU Student ID number is missing from the consent form which Tinubu filed to obtain a copy of his certificate (CSU 0014). Every student has an ID number
—Tinubu signed the consent form (CSU 0014) on 28th June 2023 addressed to the Registrar and Jamal Orr (Associate General Counsel for Chicago State University) responded 28th June 2023 (same day) with ALL the documents and records.
READ ALSO : Possible Female Version of Bola A Tinubu unraveled
If it was addressed to the registrar how is Jamal able to respond so quickly on the same day as if it was planned?
Bureaucracy points to the fact that it should at least take more than a day to process all the records. It is suspect and points to collusion.
—Unsigned fake letter from office of the registrar (CSU 0015): Not only is the letter unsigned, the phone number for the office of the Registrar on the letter reads 7739952000 and does not correspond with the other numbers listed for the same Registrar in other documents which is: 7739952517
—Under CSU Academic Records (CSU 0016), the date 1/30/97 conspicuously appears on the top right side of the documents.
Why is a 1979 record bearing a 1997 date?
—In the first letter (CSU 0020) Tinubu’s name and address is handwritten. This goes against the content of the rest of the letter which is typewritten.
It points to the fact that the handwritten part was grafted in and superimposed over the details of the original recipient of the letter.
READ ALSO : Mainstream media Vs Well-Meaning Nigerians on Tinubu’s Certificate saga
—The same letter in the third paragraph also mentioned that “you are required to present this letter and some other form of positive identification” to gain admission to the Examination room.
Questions should be raised about what happened to the positive identification that was presented and how come the university no longer has it? The University claims not to have his international passport details, drivers license or any other form of ID. How does someone without an ID gain admission or access to the Examination room?
—In the second letter (CSU 0025) which refers to him as Mr Tinubu, his address, the date and “MR Tinubu” bear a different font from the rest of the letter which is in Italics. It points to the fact that his name, address and date were superimposed over the details of another person hence the contrasting fonts.
—The Nationality is also different. In his undergraduate application form, he fills nationality as US citizen and ticks ‘Black American’ as race.
—There is reasonable ground to suspect that the classmate who swore the affidavit that he knew him was heavily compromised to provide his documents and admission correspondences to be used to make some of the alleged forgeries for Tinubu mentioned above.
CONCLUSION: CSU is very complicit. It appears they are neck deep in the forgeries with him, the deposition today will bring clarity and will further expose more discrepancies!
About Author
Digging deep