Site icon JKCYNO BLOG

#PEPTLiveUpdates : Labour Present star Witness

Welcome to today’s presidential election petition tribunal…..

We’re moving straight to the court room…

The judges are now seated

Justice Ugo: Thank you all for coming today. I hope you will give us your full cooperation. I can see a female SAN at Peter Obi’s lawyers angle, let me call you what Livy calls you, “Valeria” ‘Everyone is now laughing’ SAN Valeria stands up a takes a bow with a huge smile on her face.

Justice Adah: You can call her Val for short but only one person can call her that. And he is not here, he’s at home The clerk has now called the case.

Labour Party – Comrade Ladi Iliya, Deputy National Chairman LP

APC – Chris Magida, Director Legal Services, APC INEC is absent again.

Lead Counsel Labour Party – SAN Livy Uzoukwu While he was announcing the names of the lawyers on his side, he said SAN Valariiiaaa (It’s actually Valerie but he’s used to calling her like that) Everyone including the judges started laughing A lawyer from the back: Just call her Val

SAN Livy: I don’t have that license to call Val, it’s with her husband

INEC: SAN AB Mahmoud Tinubu and Shettima: SAN Olanipekun

APC: SAN LO Fagbemi.

SAN Livy is now up on his feet to continue with the witness PW8 from yesterday He has passed the microphone to SAN Ikwueto to lead the proceedings for the Cyber Security Expert Witness SAN Ikwueto has now asked the witness to step forward The witness is now moving towards the witness box The Secretary is up now to “solemnly” remind the witness Dr. Chibuike about his oath yesterday.

INEC is now up to start cross examination of the witness. Hmmmmm… Let’s begin Let me wear my legal suit

INEC: Dr. You’re a very experienced Cyber Security and Risk expert

Dr: Yes

INEC: So because I’d that you should be familiar with the cyber security space of the court try

Dr: I would like you to be exact

INEC: Well you know well about cybersecurity risks in the country

Dr: It depends

INEC: In paragraph 9, you mentioned ISO D: ISO 27001 that’s what it’s called

INEC: It’s not a statutory requirement for INEC

D: You’re wrong

INEC: Is it statutory

D: Yes it is

INEC: Under what law

D: It’s under the guidelines and regulations under any ICT standard organization

INEC: It is not statutory

D: It is statutory

INEC: Under which law

D: Under NITDA, the minimum requirement is ISO

INEC: When were you instructed by Labour Party to carry out this

D: On March 10 2023

INEC: And when did you complete

D: I did a preliminary on 17th March and the Middle of May was when I submitted the final report.

INEC: Before you started the report you read the report and replies of the petition

D: Yes

INEC: You read the petition and reply before you started your investigation

D: You are wrong. That is wrong

INEC: So you never read the report reply or petition. That is why you are saying to the court

D: That would be wrong. I read it at the point of my final report

INEC: In paragraph 18, you referred to errors

D: Yes

INEC: I’m reaching your conclusion, you did not speak to anyone from INEC

D: I did not have to

INEC: You did not

D: I did not

INEC: In your paragraph 19, you talked about testing an app before it is deployed

D: That’s correct

INEC: And you mentioned it’s to detect potential errors. I suggest to you that errors can be discovered at testing stage D: Thats correct

INEC: And sometimes it is detected after deployment

D: That is not correct. It’s going to be a very small error and not on that large scale. It’s very probable but not huge like what happened INEC: But it’s not impossible

D: It’s not impossible Hmmmmm

INEC: in paragraph 22 and 23 you mentioned meta data Yes, that it would show meta data

INEC: You talked about 3 polling units there on that paragraph Yes

INEC: Did you inspect the form EC8As of those 3 polling units I did not have to

INEC: You cannot tell if the result of those 3 PU were possibly collated, the EC8As That was not for me to do. I only presented the facts

INEC: You have not answered Well I think you should rephrase the question

INEC: I will not rephrase it Well I cannot answer to that

INEC: Okay. So all you did was on your computer Yes

INEC: Let me see exhibit PCA2. You’re familiar with the Amazon services Very familiar

INEC: How familiar As related to security, I would say very

INEC: The AWS is from Amazon right You’re correct this time Everyone is laughing

INEC: AWS is responsible for the components No. There are 3 properties, confidentiality and INEC cuts him short INEC: No no I don’t want to hear your explanation Well I want to explain INEC: I said I don’t want to explain

Justice Tsammani: We want to hear the explanation

INEC: That’s not what I asked him Ikwueto is now up

San Ikwueto: I didn’t want to stand up at all today but the lordships say he want to hear him. Let him speak Witness: Confidentiality, integrity and availability and availability is the responsibility of AWS which is CIA

INEC: That’s okay

Justice Adah: Let him speak ‘Everyone is now hailing the judges, Ogbeni let him speak.

INEC: Is there anything about electronic collation system on your document on exhibit PCA2 Yes. It is inferred on the last paragraph

INEC: Read it out loud He reads it INEC: So where is it

Witness: On the last paragraph

INEC: Okay, that would be all.

Tinubu and Shettima’s lawyer is now up

Olanipekun O: Was it in your brief to help Labour Party respond to their petition

W: I am a subject matter expert

O: Answer my question

W: No it was not

O: Did you inspect any BVAS

W: No

O: Did you interview Festus Okoye on the document you referred to

W: No

O: In paragraph 23, Bauchi State, are you aware PDP won there

W: I’m not aware

O: In paragraph 24, you referred to Anambra State, are you aware the Labour Party won in that LGA you referred and also the State with over 95%. This party is the party that brought you here

W: I am not aware. I am not bias. I only gave expert services

O: I didn’t say you are bias. Are you aware of the fact that Labour Party won states in the presidential election with over 6 million states

W: I am not aware

O: You mentioned meta data

W: I explained in my statement

O: Please say it out now

W: It describes information of other data

O: Your exhibit A is made up of 11 pages W: Let me count. Witness is counting really slowly

W: You’re correct but it extends more that 11

O: Oh how many Witness is still counting and wasting time

W: It’s 23

O: You mentioned things that are coded W: What do you mean by coded

O: Which are not explained.

Correct W: You are not correct

O: The information here, tell my lords what decryption is

W: Give me time

O: No explain

W: I just want to think of a simpler term. It means information that is readable

O: You also supplied links in your statement

W: Yes

O: By supplying links, you want the court to go and browse and get the information by themselves

Witness: No, let me explain Ikwueto is now up Ikwueto and Olanipekun are now in a heated argument

Ikwueto: He said he wants to explain.

O: I am on my feet, Sit down. I don’t need his explanation

Witness: I said I want to explain, I didn’t just say no

O: And I don’t need your explanation

Ikwueto: Then why did you ask  him the question

O: You are making me shout, don’t annoy me. I said I don’t need his explanation Wahalaaaa ohhhhh

Be right back… To be continued..

 

Exit mobile version